Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2400G - 181 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £175.0 vs £325.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77888 minutes ago
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
63.06682577565632%
Multi-Core
3294
39.093282696415855%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |