Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £175.0 vs £218.88
- Up to 16% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - £0.97 vs £1.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 191 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
180
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.97/FPS
100%
Price, £
£175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15341 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.15/FPS
84%
Price, £
£218.88
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for £218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15553 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |