Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2515 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-9370 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £189.97 vs £325.0
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74068 minutes ago
Buy for £189.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |