Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 189 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-10900F - 560 vs 542 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £197.0 vs £325.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74087 minutes ago
Buy for £197 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74087 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
76.91601652134007%
Multi-Core
8426
70.90801986030463%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |