Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10850K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10850K is 282 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - 137 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - £295.0 vs £599.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - £2.15 vs £4.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Buy for £599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |