Buy on Amazon
£565
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1181 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £565.0 vs £579.98
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 13% better in Ready or Not than Core i9-10900X - 306 vs 271 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 150 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
CPU Intel Core i9-10900X 2066 Cascade BX
Buy for £565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77832 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KS, 24 (8p+16e) Cores, 32 Threads, 32 MB Cache
Buy for £579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Single-Core
1576
50.75684380032206%
Multi-Core
9371
42.92126597352631%
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 24 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
