Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3770 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £29.0 vs £465.99
- Up to 92% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-13900KF - £0.19 vs £2.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 25% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3470S - 195 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 32 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.39/FPS
7%
Price, £
£465.99
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |