Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900KF

3.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KF Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36M Cache, up to 5.8 GHz

Buy for £405.42 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75746 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

3.5 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Logo
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor - (12 Core/24 Threads) - YD192XA8AEWOF

Buy for £99.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75747 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900KF

3.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KF Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36M Cache, up to 5.8 GHz

Buy for £405.42 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75746 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

3.5 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Logo
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor - (12 Core/24 Threads) - YD192XA8AEWOF

Buy for £99.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75747 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF

  • Performs up to 16% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 199 vs 171 FPS
  • Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads

Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

  • Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £99.99 vs £405.42
This is a free version of God of War.
God of War

God of War

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Core i9-13900KF

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022


FPS

199

100%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

£405.42

24%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-13900KF Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36M Cache, up to 5.8 GHz

Buy for £405.42 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75746 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017


FPS

171

85.92964824120602%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

£99.99

100%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor - (12 Core/24 Threads) - YD192XA8AEWOF

Buy for £99.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75747 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Core i9-13900KF

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Core i9-13900KF

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022


Single-Core

2973

100%

Multi-Core

20101

100%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017


Single-Core

1174

39.4887319206189%

Multi-Core

6976

34.70474105765882%

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo

Intel Core i9-13900KF

vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Logo

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Sep 27th, 2022
Release DateAug 10th, 2017
Core i9CollectionRyzen Threadripper
Raptor LakeCodenameWhitehaven
Intel Socket 1700SocketAMD Socket SP3r2
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
24
Cores12
32
Threads24
3.0 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.5 GHz
5.8 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed4.0 GHz
125 W
TDP180 W
10 nm
Process Size14 nm
30.0xMultiplier
35.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using Core i9-13900KF or Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

God of War, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.