Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1358 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Valorant than Core i5-9400F - 986 vs 773 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £127.89 vs £465.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-13900KF - £0.17 vs £0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
986
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
36%
Price, £
£465.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
773
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£127.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £127.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |