Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1826 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - £98.66 vs £343.42
- Up to 62% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-14700F - £0.18 vs £0.47 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 33% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-9400F - 738 vs 555 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 28 vs 6 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
555
75%
Value, £/FPS
£0.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £98.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15409 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
738
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
38%
Price, £
£343.42
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for £343.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
6 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |