Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 637 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 1600 - 131 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - £128.88 vs £220.6
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 1600 - £0.98 vs £1.76 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.98/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12516 minutes ago
Buy for £220.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |