Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £264.0 vs £495.49
- Up to 39% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900K - £1.93 vs £3.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10900KF - 157 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
87%
Value, £/FPS
£1.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£264
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £264 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.16/FPS
61%
Price, £
£495.49
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for £495.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |