Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF and the cheaper Core i7-10700 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700 - 113 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £204.0 vs £270.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900KF - £1.85 vs £2.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16477 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
110
97%
Value, £/FPS
£1.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16478 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |