Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3800X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3800X - 195 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £215.0 vs £267.98
- Up to 19% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900KF - £1.11 vs £1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.37/FPS
81%
Price, £
£267.98
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for £267.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |