Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - £264.0 vs £535.12
- Up to 44% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900 - £1.44 vs £2.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900KF - 207 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
88%
Value, £/FPS
£1.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£264
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £264 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Buy for £535.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |