Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £270.0 vs £399.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £2.2 vs £2.56 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 27% better in New World than Core i9-10900KF - 156 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
78%
Value, £/FPS
£2.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19539 minutes ago
Buy for £399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |