Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2069 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Rocket League than Celeron B815 - 705 vs 665 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
705
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |