Buy on Amazon
£138
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2564 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron B815 - 235 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 6 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
235
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-9400F 2.9GHz LGA1151 Box
Buy for £138 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
