Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 495 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 11% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 115 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £127.89 vs £163.79
- Up to 29% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £1.11 vs £1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
115
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£127.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £127.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
104
90%
Value, £/FPS
£1.57/FPS
70%
Price, £
£163.79
78%
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |