Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 735 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7500T - 158 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - £127.95 vs £158.28
- Up to 20% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7500T - £0.81 vs £1.01 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
158
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£127.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £127.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Buy for £158.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |