Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500T - 132 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - £101.31 vs £162.51
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500T - £0.77 vs £1.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £162.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £101.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |