Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - £102.73 vs £174.31
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-13400 - £0.43 vs £0.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-10400F - 269 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£102.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £102.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for £174.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |