Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F and the cheaper Core i5-10400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £98.8 vs £218.88
- Up to 50% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i7-10700F - £0.51 vs £1.03 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Diablo IV than Core i5-10400F - 212 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9392 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
212
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.03/FPS
49%
Price, £
£218.88
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for £218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |