Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 9% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-6350 - 119 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - £39.99 vs £225.0
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63707 minutes ago
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63707 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |