Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - £39.99 vs £227.69
- Up to 79% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-12700F - £0.21 vs £1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 20% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-6350 - 226 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
189
83.6283185840708%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58085 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
226
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
20.792079207920793%
Price, £
£227.69
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for £227.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58086 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |