Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 23 than Core i7-7700K - 239 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - £188.66 vs £225.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen 3 3300X - £0.81 vs £0.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3448 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
232
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £188.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |