Buy on Amazon
£49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2747 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - £49.99 vs £329.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 5950X - £0.45 vs £2.54 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 130 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-6350 Black Edition CPU (AM3+, Hex Core, 3.90GHz, 14MB, 125W, Advanced Bit Manipulation)
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Processor (16C/32T, 72MB Cache, Up to 4.9 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £329.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
