Buy on Amazon
€352.44
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $564
Availability
MSRP in USD: $564
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3332 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 131% better in F1 23 than FX-8320E - 340 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $130.17 vs $317.51
- Up to 6% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.98 vs $1.04 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
340
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
94%
Price, €
€352.44
40%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF New Gaming Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) - Unlocked
Buy for €352.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
