Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 2771 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320E - 200 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than FX-8320E - $103.07 vs $144.49
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320E - $0.57 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €114.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 5700 | vs | FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |