Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3332 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $160.38 vs $390.09
- Up to 41% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-14900K - $0.72 vs $1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 44% better in Lost Ark than FX-8320E - 319 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7106 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
319
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
59%
Price, €
€390.09
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7105 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |