Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2256 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $144.49 vs $234.58
- Up to 23% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 9 5900X - $0.82 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 24% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-8320E - 243 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Buy for €260.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |