Buy on Amazon
€160.38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP $409
Availability
MSRP $409
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 2620 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - $144.49 vs $168.01
- Up to 3% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-12700K - $0.99 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-8320E - 183 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Core i7-12700K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
97%
Price, €
€186.49
85%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-12700K Gaming Desktop Processor with Integrated Graphics and 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W
Buy for €186.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i7-12700K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
