Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2947 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $160.38 vs $446.27
- Up to 50% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.72 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 41% better in Lost Ark than FX-8320E - 313 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7105 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
313
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
50%
Price, €
€446.27
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €446.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7105 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |