Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2947 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $144.49 vs $250.79
- Up to 27% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i7-13700K - $1.10 vs $1.50 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 27% better in Saints Row than FX-8320E - 185 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
73%
Price, €
€278.38
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €278.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |