Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1769 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than FX-8320E - 542 vs 504 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than FX-8320E - $114.41 vs $160.38
- Up to 34% better value when playing World of Tanks than FX-8320E - $0.21 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €114.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7124 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |