Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2256 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-8320E - 192 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $130.17 vs $255.18
- Up to 49% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.76 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €283.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |