Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2947 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Halo Infinite than FX-8320E - 178 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $144.49 vs $401.89
- Up to 58% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Ryzen 9 7950X - $1.06 vs $2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €446.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |