Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2947 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 61% better in Dota 2 than FX-8320E - 268 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $130.17 vs $285.89
- Up to 26% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.87 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
268
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
74%
Price, €
€317.34
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €317.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |