Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1769 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320E - 124 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 13% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $130.17 vs $149.89
- Up to 2% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 3700X - $1.31 vs $1.34 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €166.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5239 minutes ago
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |