Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1769 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 161% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320E - 60 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than FX-8320E - $103.88 vs $144.49
- Up to 72% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320E - $1.92 vs $6.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€115.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €115.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |