Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3056 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 26% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8320E - 402 vs 318 FPS
- Up to 11% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-8320E - $0.4 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $130.17 vs $145.5
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
402
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |