Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 3415 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320E - 215 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than FX-8320E - $105.50 vs $144.49
- Up to 36% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320E - $0.54 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 5600GT | vs | FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |