Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2681 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 34% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8320E - 145 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than FX-8320E - $106.73 vs $130.17
- Up to 39% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8320E - $0.82 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€118.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €118.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |