Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 2106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $23.77 vs $105.50
- Up to 71% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $0.24 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G4900 - 142 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
111
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
29%
Price, €
€117.11
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |