Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $23.77 vs $250.79
- Up to 85% better value when playing New World than Core i7-13700K - $0.26 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 57% better in New World than Celeron G4900 - 157 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
100
64%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.77/FPS
15%
Price, €
€278.38
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €278.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |