Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1311 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $23.77 vs $219.10
- Up to 86% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-12900KF - $0.33 vs $2.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Remnant II than Celeron G4900 - 100 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
80
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
100
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.43/FPS
14%
Price, €
€243.2
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |