Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1311 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $23.77 vs $117.35
- Up to 73% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-12600KF - $0.17 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G4900 - 202 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
27%
Price, €
€130.26
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €130.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |