Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 1311 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - $26.39 vs $171.16
- Up to 78% better value when playing New World than Core i7-12700KF - $0.26 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 46% better in New World than Celeron G4900 - 146 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
100
68%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7456 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
22%
Price, €
€171.16
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €171.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7457 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |