Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $26.39 vs $446.27
- Up to 91% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.26 vs $2.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 54 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 61% better in New World than Celeron G4900 - 161 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
100
62%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7503 minutes ago
Buy for €446.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7503 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |