Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1393 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $26.39 vs $69.19
- Up to 36% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-12100F - $0.16 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 54 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 74% better in F1 23 than Celeron G4900 - 279 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
57%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7472 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
64%
Price, €
€69.19
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7472 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |