Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 947 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $23.77 vs $234.58
- Up to 88% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5900X - $0.15 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 203 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Buy for €260.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |